7 minute read

Map dependencies before choosing a platform
Most migration overruns come from dependencies discovered mid project: a reporting tool nobody owns, a scheduled job on a forgotten server, an integration held together by a spreadsheet.
A dependency map produced in the first two weeks reduces that risk more than any platform decision.
Sequence workloads by risk, not by convenience
Move low risk, low dependency systems first to prove the process and build the team's confidence. Leave the systems that carry revenue until the runbook has been exercised at least twice.
- Wave one: file storage, internal tools, development environments
- Wave two: line of business applications with clear owners
- Wave three: revenue critical and heavily integrated systems
Run parallel where the stakes are high
For critical systems, run the old and new environments side by side for a defined period with a tested rollback. The additional cost of a few weeks of duplication is small next to the cost of an unplanned outage.
Control cost from day one
Cloud spending grows quietly. Set budgets and alerts before the first workload moves, tag every resource to an owner, and review consumption monthly. Right sizing after ninety days of real usage data typically recovers a meaningful share of the bill.
Key takeaways
- Dependency mapping prevents most migration overruns
- Sequence waves by risk so the process is proven before it matters
- Parallel running with a tested rollback protects revenue systems
- Budgets, tags, and alerts belong in place before the first workload moves
